On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 18:30, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Bruce suggested to me off-list that when I commit a patch with >> revisions, I ought to attach the committed patch to the email in which >> I say that I have committed it. I know that Bruce habitually does >> this, but I've never found it very helpful, since I prefer to look at >> the patch either using the pgsql-committers emails or the git >> respository. > > I quite agree --- people who want to read the committed patch are going > to go to the source, not to what somebody claims he committed.
Yeah, +1. I always go to one of the other sources (most of the time, the gitweb or git server). It doesn't hurt to attach it if it happens to be around, but I wouldn't suggest spending any extra effort on it... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
