Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Or use errmsg_internal instead of errmsg.
> I've changed them to elog() before you said this. Would you like me to > change them to errmsg_internal or do you mean "...as an option in the > future"? It's just a different option. elog for debug messages is a well established practice, but if you wanted something that looked more like ereport, you could hide the messages from translation with the above. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers