On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 21:42, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Has anyone ever noticed that the order of pg_stat_activity timestamp > columns is illogical: > > xact_start | timestamp with time zone | > query_start | timestamp with time zone | > backend_start | timestamp with time zone |
Well, 7.4 had only "query start". 8.1 added backend. 8.3 added transaction. So I guess my original guess that things were just added on the end was wrong :-) > query_start is always between the other two timestamps. Moving > query_start before xact_start would make the most sense. I wouldn't > bring this up except we just added application_name before these > columns, so we are already going to have different column locations for > these fields in 9.0. > > Should we move query_start? Or perhaps we should consider moving application_name to the end so it *doesn't* break them? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers