On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> This is making things worse, not better. You have just changed the >>> behavior, and not in a good way. Formerly these were no-ops on >>> a unix socket connection, and now they can throw errors. > >> Is this the proper way to fix the issue? Patch attached. > > AFAICS there is no issue, and the code is fine as-is. >
ah! now i see this clearer... sorry for the noise -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
