On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > #3 is still an absolute nonstarter, especially for a patch that we'd > wish to backpatch.
You're at least going to want to exclude Safe 2.20 - 2.23, IIUC. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers