Dave Page wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Craig Ringer > <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote: > >> Why _not_ distribute gettext headers, though? Sources I can understand >> for size reasons, but the headers are small and fuss free, and you need >> the _right_ _versions_ to build against the Pg backend. > > No reason, other than I didn't realise they were needed to build extension. >
Ah, fair enough. I read: > We do include the library. We don't include the headers or source for > third party code though - that would be considered part of the build > environment, just the same as the Windows SDK. as "we don't want to distribute third-party headers even if required by Pg's own headers" and thus thought you *did* know but by policy didn't want to distribute them. -- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
