On 3/4/10 2:47 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: > This TODO item really needs to be addressed for 9.0? Frankly I'm not > familiar with that area, so I've not work on it at all yet, but I'm > going to create the patch if many people want it for 9.0. What is > your opinion?
I think it falls under "nice to have, but not essential for 9.0". --Josh Berkus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
