I don't see this as every having been applied. What should we do with it?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > > Tom, > >> Is anyone interested enough to try it if I code it? > > > If you're patient for results, sure. I seem to be doing a customer > > migration or upgrade every week now, so it wouldn't take me long to have > > a test subject with a fairly complex database. > > Here's a draft patch that does ordering using two lists, as I proposed. > Please test to see if it's any faster or slower than the original logic. > > Note: since this changes struct TocEntry, be sure to recompile all files > in src/bin/pg_dump/ after patching. > > regards, tom lane > Content-Description: alternate-parallel-restore-1.patch.gz [ Type application/octet-stream treated as attachment, skipping... ] > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
