On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I think this is basically a planner problem and should be fixed in the > planner, not by expecting users to make significant changes in > application logic in order to create an indirect effect.
I would agree if I thought that were possible, but I'm skeptical about your proposed solution. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
