Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > >> > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> >> It will affect any dbname or username in mixed or upper case, not just > >> >> ALL, won't it? > >> > >> > No, I am suggesting to change only the comparisons to the literals > >> > "all", "sameuser", "samegroup" and "samerole". > > > > What happened to this idea? > > > >> Hmm. ?These words are effectively keywords, so +1 for treating them > >> case-insensitively, as we do in SQL. ?But I wonder whether there isn't > >> an argument for making the comparisons of role and database names > >> behave more like SQL, too --- that is FOO matches foo but not "FOO". > > > > And this one? > > Nobody's implemented them? I'd suggest adding these to the TODO.
Added: |Process pg_hba.conf keywords as case-insensitive -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers