What happened to this patch? I don't see any objections, but it was not applied.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Cox wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Jim Cox escribi?: > > > >> Attached s/b a patch for the 8.5 TODO "Add comments to output indicating > >> version > >> of pg_dump and of the database server" (pg_dump/pg_restore section, 9.2). > > > > Hmm, what happens if you do a pg_dump -Fc? ?Is this info saved anywhere > > in the dump? ?Surely if thi is useful in the text dump, it is useful in > > the binary format dumps too. > > (forgot to reply all) > > pg_restore's "-l, --list print summarized TOC of the archive" option > does display the information in custom format dumps, e.g.: > > prompt$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_restore -l < /tmp/mytest.dump > ; > ; Archive created at Tue Sep 29 13:48:37 2009 > ; dbname: mytest > ; TOC Entries: 9 > ; Compression: -1 > ; Dump Version: 1.11-0 > ; Format: CUSTOM > ; Integer: 4 bytes > ; Offset: 8 bytes > ; Dumped from database version: 8.4.0 > ; Dumped by pg_dump version: 8.4.0 > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
