Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Jaime Casanova wrote: > >> i like this with or without the (), but maybe we are breaking client > >> apps if change that > > > Ah, so you like FUNCTION. > > You can NOT change the line tag without almost certainly breaking > log-reading tools like pgfouine. Even changing the content of the line > risks that, and for no visible gain. > > This seems like the worst form of bike-shedding to me. This log entry > has been formatted this way since 7.4, and nobody has ever complained > about it, until you suddenly decided it was a problem. Leave it be.
I propose to add '()' because it is confusing without it. I don't think many people are using the feature or we would have received suggestions for improvmement. As you can see, once I posted about it, there were a number of people who wanted improvements. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
