Ivan Sergio Borgonovo escreveu: > That's pretty expensive. > Ugh? > I mean... I just would like my .so end up with the expected name > somewhere else. It's just two command lines [1].
> Wouldn't it be better if make install could install stuff where I > ask so I could put modules in different places *even* for the same > installation of postgres? Why do you want to mess your installation? Besides, you will need to add the install path in dynamic_library_path and or the absolute path to your CREATE FUNCTION script. Man, that's too much work for a packager! Of course, you can always build on your way; that's up to you. > I mean... what's so weird about being able to develop postgres > modules without requiring people build the whole postgresql or > switching back and forward from root? > Ugh? You don't need root; I mean, you can always set absolute path or even the dynamic_library_path [2] parameter. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/xfunc-c.html#DFUNC [2] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/runtime-config-client.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-CLIENT-OTHER -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
