Matteo Beccati wrote: > Il 19/01/2010 09:44, Magnus Hagander ha scritto: > >As long as the templating is separated from the code, it doesn't > >matter if it's a dedicated templating engine or PHP. The point being, > >focus on the contents and interface, porting the actual > >HTML-generation is likely to be easy compared to that. > > I've been following the various suggestions. Please take a look at > the updated archives proof of concept: > > http://archives.beccati.org/
I like this. Sorry for being unable to get in touch with you on IM. It's been a hectic time here with only very few pauses. Some things: * the list of lists and groups of lists are stored in two JSON files. Should I send you a copy of them so that you can tweak your code to use them? They are generated automatically from the wwwmaster database. * We have a bunch of templates that you could perhaps have used, if you hadn't already written all of it ... :-( * While I don't personally care, some are going to insist that the site works with Javascript disabled. I didn't try but from your description it doesn't seem like it would. Is this easily fixable? * The old monthly interface /list/yyyy-mm/msg*php is not really necessary to keep, *except* that we need the existing URLs to redirect to the corresponding new message page. I think we should be able to create a database of URL redirects from the old site, using the Message-Id URL style. So each message accessed using the old URL style would require two redirects, but I don't think this is a problem. Do you agree? * We're using Subversion to keep the current code. Is your code version-controlled? We'd need to import your code there, I'm afraid. > Last but not least, it's backwards compatibile with the > /message-id/* URI. The other one (/list/yyyy-mm/msg*.php) is > implemented, but I just realized that it has problems dealing with > the old archive weirdness (2009-12 shows also some messages dated > aug 2009 nov 2009 or jan 2010 for -hackers). I'm surprised about the Aug 2009 ones, but the others are explained because the site divides the mboxes using one timezone and the time displayed is a different timezone. We don't really control the first one so there's nothing to do about it; but anyway it's not really important. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
