On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes. > > > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at > > all. > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items. This > is a work item, and not a small one. What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in 9.1?
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
