On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Alastair Turner <b...@ctrlf5.co.za> wrote: > ..... > > Given that it potentially produces a delimited list, not a straight > conacatenation (and that list is unacceptable since it would be > descriptive as a noun but not as a verb) would implode_agg not be the > most descriptive name? >
Actually, scratch that. The other *agg functions are named for what they produce as output. Not for their process - as per the objection to list_agg and suggestions of conact_agg and implode_agg. string_agg would be consistent, which is a wonderful thing if you can get it in a naming scheme. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
