Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:30 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> +1 for removing default_do_language, too.
> +1 for removing default_do_language OR adding default_language.
> I prefer a hard-wired default of PLpgSQL, so a missing language
> statement on a DO block is always interpreted the same.
So it seems everyone is okay with the latter? (Remove
default_do_language in place of a hard-wired default of "plpgsql",
don't change CREATE FUNCTION's behavior.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
