Leonardo F <m_li...@yahoo.it> wrote: > Anyone? I'd like some feedback before moving on to do the seq scan + sort in > those > CLUSTER cases where "use_index_scan" returns false...
+1 for CLUSTER using sort. I have a couple of comments for the current implementation: * Do we need to disable sort-path for tables clustered on a gist index? * I'd prefer to separate cost calculation routines from create_index_path() and cost_sort(), rather than using a dummy planner. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
