2010/1/15 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> No longer applies, please rebase. >> >> fixed, sorry >
my idea was: * string * escape_string * escape_ident * bytea * escape_bytea But I am not strong in it. Maybe this part of doc needs more love - long time there are doc to deprecated functions. It could be moved. Pavel > Hmm. I think that pqEscapeIdentConn should be in a separate section > of the documentation, entitled "Escaping Identifiers for Inclusion in > SQL Commands". Or else we should merge the existing sections > "Escaping Strings for Inclusion in SQL Commands" and "Escaping Binary > Strings for Inclusion in SQL Commands" and then put this in there too. > > On a perhaps-related note, does anyone understand why "Escaping > Strings for Inclusion in SQL Commands" is formatted in a way that is > needlessly inconsistent with the preceding and following sections? I > was surprised by the magnitude of the doc diff hunk in this patch, but > when I looked at it it seems to read more clearly with these changes. > > I have yet to fully review the code but on a quick glance it looks reasonable. > > ...Robert > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
