2010/1/11 Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com>: > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >>> I recall having tried AOX a long time ago but I can't remember the reason >>> why I was not satisfied. I guess I can give another try by setting up a test >>> ML archive. >> >> I tried it too, before I started writing the new prototype archiver >> from scratch. I too forget why I gave up on it, but it was a strong >> enough reason for me to start coding from scratch. >> >> BTW, we only need to replace the archiver/display code. The search >> works well already. > > What the current archiver looks like? A PG database containing the raw > mails and attachements? It that's the case the missing piece would be to > plug a browsing UI atop of that, right?
No, the current archiver is a set of MBOX files that are processed incrementally by mhonarc. (yes, this is why it doesn't scale) *search* is in a postgresql database, but it doesn't contain the entire messages - doesn't have attachments for examples - only the parts it has web-scraped off the the current archives. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
