> > ... then trailing zeros are hacked out, > > two digits at a time. > > I was wondering why it seemed to always want to produce an even number > of fractional digits. Why are you doing it 2 at a time and not 1? > I should think timestamp(1) would produce 1 fractional digit, not > two digits of which the second is always 0 ...
Yup, same here. I'd also prefer 1 at a time. If you want compatibility, I would do it only for the first 2 digits. Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
