... > Sure, I said *after* we fail to find an exact match. But the "freebie" > match is for a function name that matches a type name and is > binary-compatible with the source type. That's not a weak constraint. > ISTM that interpretation should take priority over interpretations that > involve more than one level of transformation.
Ah, OK I think. If there is a counterexample, it is probably no less obscure than this one. - Thomas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]