Hi, Le 28 déc. 2009 à 21:33, Kevin Grittner a écrit : > We often see posts from people who have more active connections than > is efficient.
How would your proposal better solve the problem than using pgbouncer? <mad proposal time> I'd be in favor of considering how to get pgbouncer into -core, and now that we have Hot Standby maybe implement a mode in which as soon as a "real" XID is needed, or maybe upon receiving start transaction read write command, the connection is handled transparently to the master. </> Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers