Hi,

Le 28 déc. 2009 à 21:33, Kevin Grittner a écrit :
> We often see posts from people who have more active connections than
> is efficient.

How would your proposal better solve the problem than using pgbouncer?

<mad proposal time>
I'd be in favor of considering how to get pgbouncer into -core, and now that we 
have Hot Standby maybe implement a mode in which as soon as a "real" XID is 
needed, or maybe upon receiving start transaction read write command, the 
connection is handled transparently to the master.
</>

Regards,
-- 
dim
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to