--On 15. Dezember 2009 12:10:09 -0500 Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com>
wrote:
But I'm afraid we're already out of time for this one if you're still
tweaking the probes here. With a functional change like that, our
normal process at this point would be to have the reviewer re-evaluate
things before they head to a committer, and I don't feel like this patch
is quite at 100% yet--in particular, the probe documentation is improving
but still a bit rough. I don't feel like we're quite ready to mark this
one for commit for this one, and today we really want to clear the queue
for things for committers to deal with. Please send that updated
version, and let's keep working on this into the next CommitFest, where
it will be in the front of the queue rather than how it ended up at the
tail of this one just based on its submission date. You're not really
getting a fair chunk of time here between your review and the end here
because of problems lining up reviewer time, that shouldn't happen next
time.
That seems reasonable.
I hope i could contribute something, even this was the first time i got my
hands on reviewing this DTrace thingie.
--
Thanks
Bernd
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
