On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 11:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I definitely wouldn't presume that anybody using Hot Standby would > > necessarily want NOTIFY to reach the standby, especially if there was an > > overhead to doing so. If using NOTIFY is the favoured approach, I would > > add a separate parameter for it and/or an explicit option on NOTIFY. > > Yeah, I had just come to the same conclusion: you'd want a separate > spigot handle on sending NOTIFY to WAL, regardless of any general flag > about HS.
Anybody know the latest on in-memory NOTIFY? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
