KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > We don't have any reason why still CASE ... WHEN and subquery for the given > LOID. Right?
Ah, I see. I used your suggestion. I applied the bug fixes. Our tools and contrib modules will always use pg_largeobject_metadata instead of pg_largeobject to enumerate large objects. I removed "GRANT SELECT (loid) ON pg_largeobject TO PUBLIC" from initdb because users must use pg_largeobject_metadata.oid when they want to check OIDs of large objects; If not, they could misjudge the existence of objects. This is an unavoidable incompatibility unless we always have corresponding tuples in pg_largeobject even for zero-length large objects. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
