Itagaki Takahiro escreveu: > I think the current output is enough and useful in normal use. > We can use XML or JSON format for more details. > I don't think it is a good idea to have different information in different formats. I'm with Robert; *don't* do that. If you want to suppress the other ones in text format, do it in the others too. One idea is to add them only if we prefer the VERBOSE output.
> I think > Blocks Hit: 1641 Read: 0 Temp Read: 1443 > means > Blocks (Hit: 1641 Read: 0 Temp Read: 1443) > i.e., Blocks of hit, blocks of reads, and Blocks of temp reads. > But the latter is more clear than the former. > I cannot understand what you mean -- should I suppress the lines when they > have all-zero values? > There are nodes that don't read or write blocks. If we go this way, we need to document this behavior. -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
