> 1) There is a confusion between "LATIN5" and ISO 8859-5. LATIN5 is not > ISO 8859-5, but is actually ISO 8859-9. Should we rename LATIN5 to > "ISO8859-5" (or whatever) as the encoding name? I think we should. > For your information, here are the correct mapping between ISO > 8859-n and LATINn. > > ISO 8859-1 LATIN1 > ISO 8859-2 LATIN2 > ISO 8859-3 LATIN3 > ISO 8859-4 LATIN4 > ISO 8859-9 LATIN5 > ISO 8859-10 LATIN6
I just found additions: ISO 8859-13 LATIN7 ISO 8859-14 LATIN8 ISO 8859-15 LATIN9 -- Tatsuo Ishii ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
