On Dec 3, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > Yeah, I don't remember any such consensus either, but it's not a dumb > name. I have been idly wondering throughout this process whether we > should try to pick a name that conveys the fact that these constraints > are inextricably tied to the opclass/index machinery - but I'm not > sure it's possible to really give that flavor in a short phrase, or > that it's actually important to do so. IOW... "whatever". :-)
"Whatever constraints"? "Operator Whatevers"? "WhatEVER"s? I like it. David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
