Kurt Harriman <harri...@acm.org> writes:
> (Does anybody still use a C compiler that doesn't support
> inline functions?)
The question isn't so much that, it's whether the compiler supports
inline functions with the same behavior as gcc. At minimum that
would require
* not generating extra copies of the function
* not whining about unreferenced static functions
How many compilers have you tested this patch against? Which ones
does it actually offer any benefit for?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
