Emmanuel Cecchet <m...@asterdata.com> writes:
> Actually the list is supposed to stay around between statement
> executions. You don't want to restart with a cold cache at every
> statement so I really want this structure to stay in memory at a more
> global level.
Cache? Why do you need a cache for COPY? Repeated bulk loads into the
same table within a single session doesn't seem to me to be a case that
is common enough to justify a cache.
(BTW, the quoted code seems to be busily reinventing OID Lists. Don't
do that.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
