Simon Riggs wrote: > You agree there should be two phases? I'm hesitant to say 'yes', because then you will harass me with "but you said that you would be OK with fixing X, Y, Z later! Why don't you commit already!".
Of course there should be several phases! We've *already* punted a lot of stuff from this first increment we're currently working on. The criteria for getting this first phase committed is: could we release with no further changes? If you actually want to help, can you please focus on fixing the must-fix bugs we know about? We can then discuss which of the remaining known issues we're willing to live with. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
