Robert Haas escribió: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Albert Cervera i Areny > <alb...@nan-tic.com> wrote: > > A Dijous, 12 de novembre de 2009, Euler Taveira de Oliveira va escriure: > >> Simon Riggs escreveu: > >> > So, I > >> > propose that we simply ignore patches from developers until they have > >> > done sufficient review to be allowed to develop again. > >> > >> Is it really impolite for a first-contributor, no? > > > > I don't think so, as long as it's properly explained. > > Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time > contributors, or even second-time contributors. But by about patch #3 > I think everyone should be pitching in.
+1. It's OK to not review anything if you're just doing a one-off. If you submit a bunch of patches you start becoming part of the community. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
