On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:12 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2009, at 7:43 PM, Jeff Davis wrote: > >> Either of those names are fine with me, too. The current name is a >> somewhat shortened version of the name "operator-based exclusion >> constraints", so we can also just use that name. Or, just "exclusion >> constraints". > > (exclusion constraints)++
Out of curiosity, is this feature at all similar to SQL assertions? What would we be missing to turn this into them? -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
