Fujii Masao wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Is pg_standby killed correctly when postmaster dies? > > No. In my test (v8.3.7 on Win), an immediate shutdown was able to > kill postmaster, but not pg_standby and the startup process.
Hmm. We should do something about that.. Magnus? > Though we should change those to handle the shutdown signals > correctly, this change is not imperative need. At first, we should > just get rid of the signal support from pg_standby on Win, in order > to avoid the pg_standby crash. The attached is the patch to do so. > If this patch is OK, the backport is required for 8.3.x. Ok, committed to HEAD, 8.4 and 8.3. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
