Tom Lane writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> > I don't really get the point of the SHOW STATISTICS command. There is
> > already a command whose purpose is to retrieve data in tabular form,
> > namely SELECT.
>
> I presume we need not worry about that, since the SQL committee are
> certainly not going to standardize something that's only there for
> DBs that don't support information_schema.
>
> Actually, the idea of standardizing anything at all in this area seems
> pretty bogus. The events that are interesting to measure are below the
> semantic level of the standard --- for instance, how are you going to
> count index searches, when the standard doesn't even recognize the
> existence of indexes? Let alone things like buffer cache hits, which is
> a concept that might not exist at all in some implementations. I think
> we can safely assume that the proposed standardization effort will go
> nowhere, and just look at whether this is interesting for Postgres.
>
Thanks for the feedback. I do agree, and sorry for any
confusion, the SHOW syntax was not meant for standardization at the
SQL level. We will keep your other remarks in mind as we proceed.
Best regards!
--
John
____________________________________________________________________
John Murtari Software Workshop Inc.
jmurt...@thebook.com "software that fits!" (TM)
(315) 944-0999 (x-211) http://www.SoftwareWorkshop.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
