On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 17:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > IMO, the real problem is that the type interface is poorly > encapsulated. There's way too much code that knows about the internal > details of a type - namely, that it's a 32-bit integer modified by a > second 32-bit integer. I think there are still places where the code > doesn't even know about typmod. If we're going to go to the trouble > of changing anything, I think it should probably involve inserting an > abstraction layer that will make future extensions easier. But I have > a feeling that's going to be a tough sell.
Yeah. We're way off topic for partitioning, so I think it's best to just table this discussion until someone comes up with a good idea. It's not the end of the world to write some generic C code, and have multiple types make use of it, e.g. PERIOD, PERIODTZ, INT4RANGE, FLOAT8RANGE, etc. It's a little redundant and creates some catalog bloat, but I'm not too concerned about it right now. Certainly not enough to rewrite the type system. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers