Tom Lane escribió: > Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes: > > Still far from convinced on that one. But effective_io_concurrency > > should be included even in the first pass. > > I think a design that is limited to a prespecified set of GUCs is > broken by definition. It'd be better to make it work like > ALTER DATABASE SET.
Well, not exactly like ALTER DATABASE SET because those are now stored in pg_db_role_setting. But a new spcoptions column storing an array of key/value pairs seems a reasonable way to do it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
