>>
>> I don't thing, so drop some implicit-casts was huge problem. Somebody
>> could to use Peter's patch, that recreate missing casts.
>
> True, but we should have had those compatibility pathes (Peter's patch)
> ready before we released, and advertised them in the release notes.

sure

Maybe we have to have a compatibility group. I don't support 100%
compatibility - mainly with things that should be source of bugs -
like these implicit casts. I migrate two applications (not own) and I
really found bugs there. But change of every feature should be well
supported.

Pavel


>
> --
>  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
>  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>
>  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to