Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes:
> Maybe invent a new language handler? plpgsql2 or shorten to pgsql?
> Now you can mess around all you want (and maybe fix some other
> compatibility warts at the same time).
Well, pl/psm is out there, and might even make it into core someday.
I don't find a lot of attraction in inventing a new language type that's
only marginally different from plpgsql --- that approach doesn't scale
up to handling multiple compatibility issues, at least not unless you
fix them all at the same time.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
