Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Maybe if I weren't burned out after a month of CommitFesting, I could >> muster a more positive reaction, but right now I just can't summon any >> enthusiasm for this. > > Based on this review, I am marking this patch Rejected.
Basically, I need to agree in spite of Stephen's efforts. > For what it's worth, I took a quick look at this just to see if I had > any reason to disagree with your conclusions. I don't. Sorry, please make clear the "your conclusions"? Does it mean that Tom's comment that this reworking does not go into the right direction? Or, my comment on the last message? Thanks, -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
