2009/10/7 Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com>: > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 23:32 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> It's same as my origin ideas, much better formulated. It is ok for me. > > You indicated that there may be some implementation difficulty if the > VARIADIC keyword is required for calling using named notation: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01792.php > > Do you think it would be reasonable to implement?
I thing, so this is possible. But it needs some instructions more. I would not add some "unnecessary" checks. It needs one cycle over parameters more (and one array). * check if last variadic parameter isn't default * check if last variadic parameter has flag VARIADIC * check if there are not any other parameter with VARIADIC flag * some correction in gram.y (procedural code), that allows VARIADIC in any position when named notation is active. Pavel > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
