On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * KaiGai Kohei (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote: >> Stephen Frost wrote: >> > Thanks. To make sure it gets picked up, you might respond to Tom's >> > message above with this same email. Just a thought. >> >> The following message was my reply. >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg01420.php > > Right, but now there's actually a patch to go with it.. Just thinking > that Tom might pick up on it more easily if the patch was sent to that > thread, that's all. Of course, he seems to know all anyway, so it's > entirely likely that I'm just being silly. > >> Now I'm removing something with behavior change such as above patch, >> and eliminating comments to be discussed in other thread. >> I would like to quote them not to forget them away. > > That's fine. You'll start new threads with different subject lines for > them, right? That way other people will see the specific issues and > comment if they want to. I expect few people are actually following > this very long thread at this level. :)
So what's the status of this patch currently? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers