Khee Chin <kheec...@gmail.com> wrote: > Recently, I encountered a situation where the docs on (or impl?) > INCLUDING INDEXES and INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS are not clearly defined > for primary keys. Should it be noted in the docs that in this case, we > are referring to the technical implementation of a primary key, i.e. a > unique index and a not null constraint, thus both conditions are > required?
It might be a confusable feature, but it should be discussed separated from this patch. IMO, almost all user will use "INCLUDING ALL" if the syntax is added by the patch. Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
