On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:48:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Marko Tiikkaja > <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> > >> Can you at least take a stab at it? We can fix your grammar, but > >> guessing what's going on without documentation is hard. > > > > With some help from David Fetter, I took another try at it. I > > hope someone finds this helpful. I'm happy to answer any > > questions. > > Thanks. I read through this patch some more tonight and I guess I > am a bit confused about what it accomplishes. AIUI, the point here > is to lay the groundwork for a future patch to allow writeable CTEs, > and I guess I'm not understanding how it's going to do that.
There's another branch in the repository <http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=writeable_cte.git> called actually_write which has the beginnings of an implementation based on this. If you'd like, I can send along either the patch vs. writeable_cte, or a patch against the main branch. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
