On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: >> Robert Haas wrote: >>> - There is one dblink pach left over from last CommitFest. Joe Conway >>> was going to review it the weekend of July 18th-19th, but that didn't >>> end up happening and so that patch is still waiting. We might be able >>> to find someone else to review it, but I'm not sure whether that will >>> help unless there is a committer other than Joe with bandwidth to do >>> the final review and commit. > >> I will get to it before the end of this commitfest, but I have to admit >> I'm not all that excited about this patch in the first place. I don't >> know that I agree with the need. > > Well, you're the dblink expert. If you think it should be rejected > I doubt many of us will argue with you.
Yep. CommitFest doesn't mean "commit it"; it means "decide whether to commit it". Things being rejected or returned with feedback for further improvement is fine; we're just trying to avoid long periods with no response at all. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
