Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eu...@timbira.com> writes:
> Itagaki Takahiro escreveu:
>> Thanks. Except choice of words, can I think the basic architecture of
>> the patch is ok? The codes to handle global variables like ReadBufferCount
>> and GlobalReadBufferCount could be rewrite in cleaner way if we could
>> drop supports of log_{parser|planner|executor|statement}_stats.
>>
> Yes, it is. I'm afraid someone is relying on that piece of code.
If we have a better substitute, I think there'd be nothing wrong with
removing those features. They were never anything but pretty crufty
anyway, and they are *not* a compatibility issue because applications
have no direct way to access those stats. However, you'd have to be
sure that the substitute covers all the use-cases for the old stats
... which strikes me as a lot more territory than this patch has
proposed to cover.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
