> "However, a named variadic argument can only be called the way shown in > the example above. The VARIADIC keyword must not be specified and a > variadic notation of all arguments is not supported. To use variadic > argument lists you must use positional notation instead." > > What is the intended behavior? I think we should always require VARIADIC > to be specified regardless of using named notation. >
maybe we could to support variadic named parameters in future - then using VARIADIC keyword should be necessary - like foo(10 AS p1, 20 AS p1, 30 AS p3) is equalent of foo(VARIADIC ARRAY[10,20] AS p1, 30 AS p3) if we plan this feature, the VARIADIC keyword have to be mandatory. Regards Pavel Stehule > I'm still reviewing the code. > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
