Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 04:40, Itagaki > > Takahiro<itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > > There might be some places to replace it to strlcpy() instead. > > > > Can't comment on that without looking at the code, but it wouldn't surprise > > me. > > There are some performance tradeoffs between these variants, and we > already did change all (most?) of the not performance-critical calls to > strlcpy a while ago.
Of all the macro names we use, I would have bet StrNCpy() was the last one that would have conflicted with anything. :-O Did they copy it from our code? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
