On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 10:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > As always with patches that are meant to improve performance, > > some experimental evidence would be a good thing. > > I haven't had time to performance test this patch yet, and it looks like > it will take a significant amount of effort to do so. I'm focusing on my > other work, so I don't know if this one is going to be in shape for the > September commitfest. > > If someone is interested in doing some performance testing for this > patch, let me know. I still think it has potential. > Under what kind of circumstances/workload to you think this patch is most likely to show its full potential? I can try to test it out, but would like some guidance. I am guessing it is when the anti-wrap around vacuums come due, but that is such a rare event, it could both be hard to test for and also be of limited real-world applicability. Cheers, Jeff (Janes)
